AI Visibility
measured31/100
Emerging · in Digital Asset Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
57
across 332 prompts
AI Share of Voice
57%
across 332 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Digital Asset Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Ziflow is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has 943+ G2 reviews (4.5★) and first-party comparison content like “Ziflow vs. PageProof” and “Ziflow vs. Filestage.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR so conversion-stage prompts like “How much does Ziflow cost?” can be answered directly from ziflow.com.
Based on audit of ziflow.com · Aug 30, 2026