AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals42/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 155 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 155 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Writerly.ai has meaningful B2B review authority on G2 (14 reviews, 4.7/5) and publicly visible pricing ($4/mo and $40/yr shown on its pricing draft), so it can be cited for some brand-aware evaluation queries. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison and structured extraction: there’s no evidence (from live search) of first-party “[Writerly] vs [Competitor]” pages or crawlable schema (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage), which prevents AI engines from confidently recommending it in “alternatives to” and “vs” shortlists.
Based on audit of writerly.ai · Aug 30, 2026