[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Wppedia
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

1

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

2

across 173 prompts

AI Share of Voice

0%

across 157 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
100 brand-level
Cited4%4/100
Share of voice4%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited0%0/4
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Wppedia is visible in

1
  • Wiki & Docsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

AI citation readiness for wppedia.com is weak because the domain does not show up in B2B review/analyst ecosystems (no evidence of G2/Capterra/TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights profiles in live search) and appears to be a WordPress themes/plugins content site rather than a software vendor. The single highest-ROI fix is to clarify entity identity and purpose on-site (what it is, who it’s for) and add crawlable, structured pages (FAQ/How-to) so AI can cite it for “WordPress themes/plugins” queries.

Based on audit of wppedia.com · May 31, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy