AI Visibility
measured73/100
Frequently Cited · in ESG & Sustainability
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
99
across 605 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 589 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in ESG & Sustainability
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Workiva is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 2,141 G2 reviews) and an active Gartner Peer Insights review page. The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation content for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and crawlable pricing/comparison surfaces), since pricing and schema crawlability signals appear weak from search results.
Based on audit of workiva.com · Jun 4, 2026