AI Visibility
measured46/100
Frequently Cited · in Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 386 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 386 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
WordLift is already strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a crawlable, tiered pricing page and a strong G2 presence (41 reviews, 4.7★). The biggest risk is evaluation-stage comparison citation: there is no clear evidence of first-party, indexed “[WordLift] vs Yoast/Semrush” pages, so AI engines may rely on third-party comparisons instead of citing WordLift directly.
Based on audit of wordlift.io · Oct 9, 2026