AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals52/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 13 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 13 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Wordfast is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party pricing with explicit tiers (e.g., $480 Buy Now for Wordfast Pro/Classic and $1 trial for Wordfast Anywhere) and strong third-party review presence on G2 and Capterra. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “comparison” queries: the domain shows comparison/cost content (e.g., cost comparison PDF) but no clear first-party “[Wordfast] vs [competitor]” pages surfaced in search, so AI may rely on third-party sources instead of citing wordfast.com directly.
Based on audit of wordfast.com · Oct 7, 2026