[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Wolterskluwer
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

50

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

73

across 29 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 13 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
17 category
Cited100%17/17
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Wolters Kluwer is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 presence (14 reviews, 3.0/5) and enterprise analyst recognition signals (e.g., Gartner Magic Quadrant mention for Financial Planning Software and Gartner Peer Insights “Customers’ Choice 2023” for Financial Planning). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured pages and clearer “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” surfaces) so AI can cite Wolters Kluwer directly for comparison and pricing-intent prompts rather than relying mostly on third-party review sites.

Based on audit of wolterskluwer.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy