AI Visibility
measured65/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Coding
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
54
across 212 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 212 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Coding
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
windsurf.ai is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries in the AI coding IDE/agent category because it has meaningful G2 presence (Windsurf/Exafunction appears in G2 category pages) and active Reddit discussion. The highest-ROI fix is to restore first-party, crawlable evaluation assets on windsurf.ai (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage + pricing + brand-led comparison pages), because the homepage now redirects to devin.ai/desktop, which weakens brand-specific citation for “Windsurf vs X” and “Windsurf pricing” patterns.
Based on audit of windsurf.ai · Sep 13, 2026