AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Commerce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 300 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 284 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Commerce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Vindicia is a B2B subscription billing/failed-payment recovery SaaS with some AI-citable third-party presence (G2 profile exists with 10 reviews and 3.6/5). The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage “Vindicia vs competitor” and “Vindicia pricing” queries: the site shows plan/“pricing models” language but no clearly crawlable, tiered public pricing page surfaced in live search, and first-party comparison coverage is not evidenced. Highest-ROI fix: publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation pages (brand-led “Vindicia vs X” and “Vindicia pricing plans” with explicit tiers) and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so AI engines can quote directly from vindicia.com.
Based on audit of vindicia.com · Aug 29, 2026