[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Usercentrics
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

17

across 306 prompts

AI Share of Voice

17%

across 306 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
166 category
Cited11%19/166
Share of voice10%avg
Engine consensus61%of engines
Competitors14.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Usercentrics is visible in

2
  • Compliance Automationnot yet measured→
  • Privacy & Data Governancenot yet measured→

Executive summary

Usercentrics is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (Grid Leader, 399 reviews on the G2 seller page) and publicly crawlable pricing with specific tiers and free trial. The biggest risk pattern is conversion-stage “pricing plans / cost” queries where AI may fail to extract complete pricing context unless your pricing page is consistently crawlable across all key locales and product variants (Web CMP vs App CMP vs CTV CMP vs Privacy Policy Generator).

Based on audit of usercentrics.com · Jun 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy