AI Visibility
measured50/100
Frequently Cited · in Developer Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals11/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
56
across 826 prompts
AI Share of Voice
56%
across 826 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
18/80
Niche · Developer Tools Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Developer Tools
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TypeScript is visible in
1Your visibility gap
TypeScript surfaces in 18/80 Developer Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 62 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
TypeScript is already strongly visible in AI for generic “developer tools” and code-quality topics, and it has a solid G2 review footprint (4.6/5 from 63 reviews). The biggest AI citation risk is that typescriptlang.org lacks crawlable, evaluation-style surfaces for buyer-intent queries like “best developer tools for small businesses/startups/remote teams” and “how to streamline code collaboration,” so AI has fewer first-party pages to cite for those shortlist questions.
Based on audit of typescriptlang.org · May 6, 2026