AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Financial Crime Compliance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 198 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 198 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Financial Crime Compliance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Trustpair is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (21 reviews, 4.8★) and clear fraud-prevention positioning, but it is at risk for conversion-stage and evaluation comparison queries where AI needs crawlable first-party pricing and structured evaluation content. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, tiered first-party pricing (or at least machine-readable pricing ranges) and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data so AI can answer “How much does Trustpair cost?” and “How does Trustpair compare to SEON/Signifyd/Coupa/PayPal Payments/GoCardless?” from trustpair.com itself.
Based on audit of trustpair.com · Oct 5, 2026