AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals67/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
25
across 115 prompts
AI Share of Voice
18%
across 99 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Tricentis qTest is visible in
1Executive summary
Tricentis is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review coverage on G2 (e.g., 342 reviews for Tricentis overall on G2) and substantial TrustRadius review volume (e.g., 119 Tosca reviews, 78 qTest reviews). The biggest conversion-stage citation risk is pricing: most Tricentis product pricing pages are “request pricing” (e.g., Tosca/Testim), which limits AI engines’ ability to answer “how much does it cost?” with first-party numbers.
Based on audit of tricentis.com · Sep 1, 2026