[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
[unCited]/Thomsonreuters
ProductCitation IndexBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

57

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

57

across 17 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
4 prompts
Cited0%0/4
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 prompts
Cited40%2/5
Share of voice40%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 prompts
Cited25%1/4
Share of voice25%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 prompts
Cited0%0/4
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus0%of engines
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

Thomson Reuters is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (e.g., 812 reviews for CS Professional Suite and 807 reviews for Thomson Reuters products page) and active enterprise social authority via LinkedIn (1.9M+ followers). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led evaluation content (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and explicit “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages) so AI can cite Thomson Reuters directly for comparison and pricing-evaluation prompts rather than relying mostly on third parties.

Based on audit of thomsonreuters.com · May 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy