AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Browser Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals59/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 322 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 322 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Browser Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
blaze.today (Text Blaze) is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (21 reviews on the Text Blaze product page with a 4.9/5 rating) and clear, crawlable pricing tiers ($0 Free, $2.99/mo Pro billed yearly, $6.99/user/mo Business billed yearly). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “how much / which plan / enterprise fit” queries where AI engines need crawlable structured pricing + SoftwareApplication/FAQ schema and reliable bot access signals (llms.txt/robots.txt). Highest-ROI fix: add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data on key pages (plans/pricing, integrations, and “Text Blaze vs …” pages) and ensure llms.txt/robots.txt are accessible to AI crawlers.
Based on audit of blaze.today · Sep 1, 2026