AI Visibility
measured66/100
Frequently Cited · in Vulnerability Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
76
across 621 prompts
AI Share of Voice
77%
across 600 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vulnerability Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Tenable is visible in
3Executive summary
Tenable is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (122 reviews, 4.5★) and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Tenable vs Wiz, Tenable vs Qualys, Tenable vs Rapid7). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison coverage for the remaining required competitor prompts (Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)) and then reinforce structured evaluation content (FAQPage/SoftwareApplication) so AI can answer pricing and comparison questions without falling back to third parties.
Based on audit of tenable.com · Apr 2, 2026