[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Tenable
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

75

across 577 prompts

AI Share of Voice

76%

across 556 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Vulnerability Management · of 88

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
448 category
Cited78%350/448
Share of voice70%avg
Engine consensus59%of engines
Competitors8.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited85%11/13
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Tenable is visible in

3
  • Vulnerability Management2 of 88→
  • Cloud Security19 of 112→
  • IT Service Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Tenable is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 presence (122 reviews, 4.5★) and multiple first-party comparison pages (e.g., Tenable vs Wiz, Tenable vs Qualys, Tenable vs Rapid7). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison coverage for the remaining required competitor prompts (Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)) and then reinforce structured evaluation content (FAQPage/SoftwareApplication) so AI can answer pricing and comparison questions without falling back to third parties.

Based on audit of tenable.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy