AI Visibility
measured36/100
Emerging · in Project Management Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
40
across 236 prompts
AI Share of Voice
40%
across 236 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Project Management Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
TeamGantt is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has high-volume, high-rating G2 presence (895 reviews, 4.8/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest risk for AI engines is conversion-stage “pricing/cost” and evaluation-stage “SoftwareApplication/FAQ structured extraction” if schema/SSR coverage is incomplete—highest-ROI fix is to ensure SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema exists on pricing/product pages and that key pages are fully SSR-crawlable.
Based on audit of teamgantt.com · Oct 3, 2026