AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in AI Sales Assistant
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
27
across 119 prompts
AI Share of Voice
27%
across 119 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Sales Assistant
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Sybill is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation/trust queries because it has a strong G2 presence (146 reviews, 4.8/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with clear tiers ($0/$30/$90 per month per user). The biggest risk is conversion-stage citation for “Sybill pricing” and evaluation-stage “Sybill vs competitor” queries if first-party comparison pages and B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) are missing or not crawlable by AI engines.
Based on audit of sybill.ai · Jun 5, 2026