AI Visibility
measured58/100
Frequently Cited · in ESG & Sustainability
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
56
across 189 prompts
AI Share of Voice
56%
across 189 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
41/80
Challenger · Esg Sustainability Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in ESG & Sustainability
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sweep is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Sweep surfaces in 41/80 Esg Sustainability discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 39 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Sweep is already cited for core ESG software “how it works” and measurement/capabilities queries (e.g., “What is ESG software and how does it work?” and “How do I measure our environmental impact effectively?”), but it’s missing high-intent evaluation angles around stakeholder engagement, waste analytics, visualization, benchmarking, social impact, investor significance, portfolio sustainability, and energy monitoring. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish first-party, crawlable evaluation pages that directly answer those gap queries with structured sections (and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema) so AI engines can cite Sweep for the missing shortlist patterns.
Based on audit of sweep.net · May 12, 2026