AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in Container Orchestration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
92
across 85 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 69 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Container Orchestration
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Executive summary
SUSE is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence on G2 (e.g., SUSE Linux Enterprise Server: 72 reviews, 4.6/5) and meaningful enterprise analyst signals (Gartner Peer Insights product page exists; SUSE also claims Leader status in a 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Container Management). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/suse-linux-enterprise-server/reviews?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation content for “vs/alternatives/pricing” queries—right now pricing is often “request pricing”/partner-quote oriented, which reduces AI’s ability to cite concrete tiers for conversion prompts. ([suse.com](https://www.suse.com/how-to-buy/?utm_source=openai))
Based on audit of suse.com · May 6, 2026