AI Visibility
measured28/100
Emerging · in Content & Knowledge
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 313 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 313 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content & Knowledge
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories StudioBinder is visible in
2Executive summary
StudioBinder is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party “X vs Y” comparison pages (e.g., Storyboard That vs StudioBinder) and publicly crawlable pricing/support pages with explicit per-user/month pricing. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and structured evaluation: there’s no clearly discoverable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregate rating markup found via search, and G2 review volume appears low (18 reviews on a StudioBinder product page), which reduces shortlist likelihood for “best [category] software” prompts.
Based on audit of studiobinder.com · Aug 31, 2026