AI Visibility
measured20/100
Emerging · in Risk, Compliance & GRC
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 285 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 285 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Risk, Compliance & GRC
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Strac is visible in
2Executive summary
Strac is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (27 reviews, 4.9/5) and multiple first-party comparison-style pages (e.g., “Strac vs. the Rest of the AI Governance Market”). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure pricing is crawlable with explicit tiers, so AI can answer “pricing” and “vs” questions from Strac’s own pages rather than only from third parties.
Based on audit of strac.io · May 7, 2026