AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Social Media Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
17
across 176 prompts
AI Share of Voice
17%
across 176 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Social Media Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Statusbrew is visible in
1Executive summary
Statusbrew is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has 252 G2 reviews at 4.8★ and first-party pricing tiers are visible on the domain. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear first-party, brand-led comparison coverage for the exact competitor set (Sprout Social, Hootsuite, Agorapulse, Zoho Social, Sprinklr Social) and missing/unclear SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data—fixing those unlocks stronger citation for “best social media management software” and “How does Statusbrew compare to Sprout Social/Hootsuite?” patterns.
Based on audit of statusbrew.com · May 7, 2026