[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Statsig
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

31

across 770 prompts

AI Share of Voice

31%

across 750 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Feature Flags · of 22

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
499 category
Cited41%204/499
Share of voice34%avg
Engine consensus47%of engines
Competitors7.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited100%13/13
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Statsig is visible in

3
  • Feature Flags2 of 22→
  • Product Analytics12 of 54→
  • Developer Tools67 of 224→

Executive summary

Statsig is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (346 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison pages like /vs/posthog and /vs/launchdarkly. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for the exact evaluation prompts) so models can cite Statsig directly for “best feature management software” and “How does Statsig compare to …” queries without relying on third-party sources.

Based on audit of statsig.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy