AI Visibility
measured40/100
Frequently Cited · in Data & Analytics
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 58 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 58 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Data & Analytics
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Statista is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for category discovery and trust queries because it has strong third-party authority signals (e.g., Wikipedia presence and active discussion on Reddit) and publicly crawlable pricing tiers for business accounts. The biggest risk for evaluation-stage citation is that Statista’s own first-party “Statista vs competitor” and structured evaluation content is not clearly discoverable from the crawlable web surface (no evidence found of first-party comparison pages), so AI engines may rely on third-party sources instead of citing Statista directly for “vs/alternatives” prompts.
Based on audit of statista.com · Oct 9, 2026