AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Spend Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals8/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
18
across 179 prompts
AI Share of Voice
18%
across 179 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
6/80
Not Visible · Spend Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Spend Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories SpendHQ is visible in
1Your visibility gap
SpendHQ surfaces in 6/80 Spend Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 74 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
SpendHQ is already cited by AI for multiple spend management evaluation-style questions (e.g., procurement professionals, historical spend analysis, forecasting), supported by strong third-party review presence on G2 (60 reviews) and Gartner Peer Insights. The biggest citation risk is discovery-stage shortlist formation for high-intent gaps like “best spend management software for startups” and “spend management tools for SaaS companies,” which typically require first-party, crawlable “for [company type/use case]” pages plus comparison/evaluation content that AI can quote.
Based on audit of spendhq.com · Sep 1, 2026