AI Visibility
measured15/100
Emerging · in Billing & Invoicing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 174 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 174 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Billing & Invoicing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Vanco Payments is moderately likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (55 reviews, 4.2/5) and publicly crawlable pricing with tiered plans. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “brand vs competitor” queries: the site has comparison content, but it appears gated behind “request/get a free comparison” flows rather than fully crawlable first-party side-by-side pages.
Based on audit of vancopayments.com · Aug 30, 2026