AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals41/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
100
across 14 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 14 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Slidesgo is visible in
1Executive summary
Slidesgo is moderately likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 presence (4.7/5 with 18 reviews) and a publicly accessible pricing page with specific monthly/annual prices. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “comparison” queries: there is no clear first-party “[Slidesgo] vs [Competitor]” comparison page structure found, so AI engines will struggle to cite Slidesgo as the recommended option in vs/alternatives prompts.
Based on audit of slidesgo.com · Oct 9, 2026