AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Spend Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
72
across 19 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 2 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Spend Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Shoeboxed is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a live G2 profile (4.4/5 from 30 reviews) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with specific tiers and prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema and more brand-led “Shoeboxed vs X” pages) so AI can cite Shoeboxed directly for comparison and pricing questions rather than relying on third-party review sites.
Based on audit of shoeboxed.com · Aug 29, 2026