[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Shapr3D
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

12

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

21

across 165 prompts

AI Share of Voice

21%

across 165 prompts

Category Visibility

#15

in 3D & CAD · of 123

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
96 category
Cited10%10/96
Share of voice6%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors20.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Shapr3D is visible in

1
  • 3D & CAD14 of 123→

Executive summary

Shapr3D is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation queries because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., “Shapr3D vs SolidWorks”, “Shapr3D vs Fusion 360”) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers and per-seat pricing. The biggest remaining citation risk is structured-data completeness (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and enterprise analyst visibility (Gartner/Forrester/IDC), which can limit inclusion in high-intent enterprise shortlist answers.

Based on audit of shapr3d.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy