AI Visibility
measured59/100
Frequently Cited · in Financial Crime Compliance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals39/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
43
across 236 prompts
AI Share of Voice
43%
across 236 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Financial Crime Compliance
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories SEON is visible in
2Executive summary
SEON is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has a populated G2 profile (391 reviews) and strong review signals (e.g., ~4.6/5 on its own site claims). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable, first-party evaluation content for pricing/comparison intent (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage coverage and ensuring pricing is fully crawlable for AI crawlers), so models can cite SEON directly for “vs/alternatives/pricing” prompts rather than relying on third-party review platforms.
Based on audit of seon.io · Sep 1, 2026