[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Seismic
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

76

across 685 prompts

AI Share of Voice

77%

across 665 prompts

Category Visibility

#19

in Sales Engagement · of 189

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
622 category
Cited78%486/622
Share of voice75%avg
Engine consensus54%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited93%13/14
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Seismic is visible in

2
  • Sales Engagement19 of 189→
  • Content Marketing45 of 191→

Executive summary

Seismic is highly likely to be cited for sales enablement evaluation queries because it has strong G2 authority (1,636+ reviews and a 4.7★ rating per your pre-verified context) plus enterprise analyst recognition (Forrester Wave: Revenue Enablement Platforms, Q3 2024). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require crawlable pricing and structured product metadata (e.g., “How much does Seismic cost?” and “What is the best sales enablement software for sales content management and sharing?”) because pricing appears to be demo/contact-led rather than publicly tiered.

Based on audit of seismic.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy