[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/SAP Concur
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

74

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

99

across 409 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 393 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
280 category
Cited100%280/280
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

concur.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong third-party review authority (G2: 6,966 reviews at 4.0/5; TrustRadius: 2,039 reviews with 8.4/10) and clear first-party evaluation content (e.g., a first-party “SAP Concur vs Expensify” page). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Technical AEO for AI crawlers on pricing and structured evaluation content (ensure pricing is fully crawlable/SSR and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema on the most evaluation-intent pages).

Based on audit of concur.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy