AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Product Experience
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals49/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 326 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 326 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Digital Asset Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Product Experience
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Salsify PXM is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Salsify PXM surfaces in 0/80 Digital Asset Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Salsify has solid B2B citation foundations (G2 profile with 126 reviews and 4.4/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., “Salsify vs. Inriver”). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/sellers/salsify?utm_source=openai)) The biggest reason it’s not showing up for DAM shortlist queries is that its site content is not strongly aligned to the buyer’s DAM framing (small business/marketing team/enterprise DAM) and there’s no evidence of crawlable pricing or DAM-specific evaluation pages that AI can quote for those exact questions.
Based on audit of salsify.com · Jun 7, 2026