[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Rollbar
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

34

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

70

across 206 prompts

AI Share of Voice

70%

across 206 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Error Tracking · of 30

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
122 category
Cited78%95/122
Share of voice72%avg
Engine consensus88%of engines
Competitors21.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Rollbar is visible in

1
  • Error Tracking3 of 30→

Executive summary

Rollbar is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “Rollbar vs Sentry/Datadog” and “Rollbar pricing” because it has a strong G2 presence (172 reviews, 4.5/5) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers and limits. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for pricing/integrations/vs queries) and ensure first-party comparison pages are consistently indexed and not framed in a way that risks competitor-vs-competitor association.

Based on audit of rollbar.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy