[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Ringover
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 323 prompts

AI Share of Voice

1%

across 305 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
181 brand-level
Cited1%1/181
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors35.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited60%6/10
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited50%3/6
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited50%3/6
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Ringover is visible in

2
  • Contact Centernot yet measured→
  • Sales Engagementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Ringover is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (471 reviews, 4.6/5) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers (Smart $21/mo annual, $29/mo monthly; Business $44/$54; Advanced quote). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation surfaces for the exact competitor comparisons (Aircall, CloudTalk, JustCall, Dialpad, RingCentral) and ensure structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) is present so AI can cite Ringover directly for prompts like "How does Ringover compare to Aircall?" and "How much does Ringover cost?".

Based on audit of ringover.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy