[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/ResearchGate
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

34

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

100

across 14 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 14 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
2 category
Cited100%2/2
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

ResearchGate is unlikely to be cited by AI engines as a B2B software tool because it is primarily an academic social network/publishing platform rather than a B2B SaaS product category. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation/conversion-style queries (e.g., “pricing”, “alternatives”, “best software”) where ResearchGate has no clear first-party pricing/comparison surfaces; the highest-ROI fix is to create crawlable, question-forward pages that answer “what it is / who it’s for / how it works” in structured, AI-extractable formats (FAQ + clear entity descriptions).

Based on audit of researchgate.net · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy