AI Visibility
measured57/100
Frequently Cited · in Managed AI Inference
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals46/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
23
across 458 prompts
AI Share of Voice
24%
across 458 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
1/137
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Managed AI Inference
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Replicate is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage and conversion-stage queries because its pricing page is publicly accessible and crawlable (replicate.com/pricing) and it has strong AI-friendly documentation via llms.txt. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation queries that require first-party comparison and structured evaluation content (e.g., "How does Replicate compare to fal.ai?" / "How does Replicate compare to Hugging Face?"), where there is no clear evidence of first-party [Brand] vs [Competitor] pages on replicate.com.
Based on audit of replicate.com · May 4, 2026