[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Render
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook

Other products from Render

Render63
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

82

across 723 prompts

AI Share of Voice

83%

across 723 prompts

Category Visibility

#24

in CI/CD · of 75

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Brand Accuracy

2/117

citations with inaccuracies

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
500 category
Cited79%397/500
Share of voice76%avg
Engine consensus60%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited80%8/10
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentimentpositive10+ / 17~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentimentneutral2+ / 7~ / 0−
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 6~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Render is visible in

2
  • Serverless & Edge6 of 46→
  • CI/CD23 of 75→

Executive summary

Render is already strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries via its G2 presence (77 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party comparison content like “Render vs Vercel” plus crawlable pricing at render.com/pricing. The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure pricing/comparison pages are fully crawlable/SSR with rich snippets so AI engines can reliably cite Render for “best Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS) software” and each “How does Render compare to …” prompt pattern.

Based on audit of render.com · May 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy