AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in 3D & CAD
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals11/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 161 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 161 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
1/80
Not Visible · 3d Cad Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in 3D & CAD
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Redshift is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Redshift surfaces in 1/80 3d Cad discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 79 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Redshift3D is likely to be cited by AI for evaluation-style prompts via G2 (18 reviews, 4.1★) and for “best alternatives” style queries via third-party comparison surfaces, but it is at high risk of being missing from brand-aware evaluation answers because first-party comparison/pricing content on redshift3d.com appears not to be crawlable/indexed. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/SSR-index first-party pages that directly answer evaluation prompts (especially “How does Redshift compare to V-Ray?” and “How does Redshift compare to KeyShot?”) and include crawlable pricing/licensing details so AI can cite redshift3d.com instead of only G2.
Based on audit of redshift3d.com · May 7, 2026