AI Visibility
measured80/100
Frequently Cited · in Subscription Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
72
across 586 prompts
AI Share of Voice
73%
across 567 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Subscription Management
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Recurly is visible in
2Executive summary
Recurly is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate for subscription management queries because it has 204 G2 reviews and a visible first-party pricing page with public rates (e.g., $399/mo + 1.5% GMV + $0.10/subscription order for Shopify). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Recurly has at least one first-party comparison page (e.g., Recurly vs Zuora), there is no clear evidence (from live search) of first-party pages for every competitor in your required set (Chargebee, Zuora, Stripe Billing, Maxio, Paddle), which can cause AI engines to cite competitors instead for queries like “How does Recurly compare to Chargebee?”
Based on audit of recurly.com · Apr 2, 2026