[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Recurly
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

70

across 545 prompts

AI Share of Voice

71%

across 526 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Subscription Management · of 70

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
360 category
Cited83%299/360
Share of voice73%avg
Engine consensus66%of engines
Competitors8.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited92%12/13
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Recurly is visible in

2
  • Subscription Management2 of 70→
  • Billing & Invoicing11 of 115→

Executive summary

Recurly is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate for subscription management queries because it has 204 G2 reviews and a visible first-party pricing page with public rates (e.g., $399/mo + 1.5% GMV + $0.10/subscription order for Shopify). The biggest AI citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Recurly has at least one first-party comparison page (e.g., Recurly vs Zuora), there is no clear evidence (from live search) of first-party pages for every competitor in your required set (Chargebee, Zuora, Stripe Billing, Maxio, Paddle), which can cause AI engines to cite competitors instead for queries like “How does Recurly compare to Chargebee?”

Based on audit of recurly.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy