AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Data & Analytics
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals49/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 388 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 388 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Data & Analytics
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories reap is visible in
3Executive summary
reap.video is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2, but it is at high risk of missing “brand vs competitor” and “pricing” citations where AI needs crawlable first-party comparison/pricing signals. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/ensure first-party evaluation pages (especially “[reap] vs [competitor]” and “reap pricing” structured content) that are crawlable and indexable by AI crawlers.
Based on audit of reap.video · Sep 1, 2026