[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Qovery
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 152 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 152 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/80

Not Visible · Ci Cd Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
85 category
Cited5%4/85
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Qovery is visible in

1
  • CI/CDnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Qovery surfaces in 0/80 Ci Cd discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Qovery →

Executive summary

Qovery has strong AI-citation foundations for DevOps/IDP evaluation (notably a G2 presence and a crawlable pricing page), but it is likely under-cited for CI/CD-specific buyer intents (e.g., “CI/CD for e-commerce platforms”, “CI/CD tools for manufacturing firms”). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish CI/CD-use-case landing pages and evaluation FAQs that explicitly map Qovery to those CI/CD JTBDs, then ensure they are crawlable and schema-marked for AI extraction.

Based on audit of qovery.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy