AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Infrastructure
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
42
across 656 prompts
AI Share of Voice
42%
across 656 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Infrastructure
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
PyTorch.org is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for “what is PyTorch / how to use PyTorch” and “case study” style queries due to strong third-party review presence (e.g., TrustRadius) and extensive first-party documentation and case studies. The biggest citation risk is evaluation/conversion-style queries that expect SaaS-style comparison and pricing surfaces (e.g., “PyTorch pricing”, “PyTorch vs X” with purchasable framing); the highest-ROI fix is to add crawlable, evaluation-intent structured pages (FAQPage + comparison blocks) that explicitly answer pricing/selection questions in an AI-overview-friendly way.
Based on audit of pytorch.org · Sep 30, 2026