[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Pulumi
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

10

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

86

across 379 prompts

AI Share of Voice

86%

across 379 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in DevOps Automation · of 92

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
224 category
Cited100%223/224
Share of voice98%avg
Engine consensus52%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Pulumi is visible in

2
  • DevOps Automation5 of 92→
  • Cloud Cost Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Pulumi is a strong B2B candidate for AI citations because it has crawlable pricing with explicit tiers, first-party comparison content (e.g., Pulumi vs Terraform), and a permissive AI grounding file (llms.txt) plus an AI-friendly robots.txt. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage “shortlist” queries that rely on review/analyst surfaces: G2 review volume appears low (and TrustRadius shows 0 reviews), which can suppress AI inclusion in “best [category]” and “alternatives to [brand]” answers.

Based on audit of pulumi.com · Jun 12, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy