AI Visibility
measured51/100
Frequently Cited · in DevOps Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals10/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
82
across 449 prompts
AI Share of Voice
82%
across 449 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in DevOps Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Pulumi is a strong B2B candidate for AI citations because it has crawlable pricing with explicit tiers, first-party comparison content (e.g., Pulumi vs Terraform), and a permissive AI grounding file (llms.txt) plus an AI-friendly robots.txt. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage “shortlist” queries that rely on review/analyst surfaces: G2 review volume appears low (and TrustRadius shows 0 reviews), which can suppress AI inclusion in “best [category]” and “alternatives to [brand]” answers.
Based on audit of pulumi.com · Jun 12, 2026