AI Visibility
measured37/100
Emerging · in LLMOps Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals50/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
91
across 90 prompts
AI Share of Voice
100%
across 74 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLMOps Platforms
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Promptfoo is likely to be cited for evaluation/red-teaming how-to queries because it has strong first-party documentation and a crawlable pricing page, but it is at major risk for evaluation-stage shortlist queries that rely on G2/TrustRadius-style review signals and first-party “vs/alternatives” surfaces. The single highest-ROI fix is to secure/activate B2B review/analyst presence (especially G2 with meaningful review volume) and add first-party evaluation pages that explicitly answer “Promptfoo vs X” and “alternatives to Promptfoo” in a brand-led way.
Based on audit of promptfoo.dev · Aug 30, 2026