[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Profound
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

100

Authoritative Source

Avg Prompt Score

70

across 121 prompts

AI Share of Voice

70%

across 121 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) · of 31

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Shortlist Position

25/25

Leader · Answer Engine Optimization Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
35 category
Cited100%35/35
Share of voice72%avg
Engine consensus60%of engines
Competitors28.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors4.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Profound is visible in

1
  • Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)1 of 31→

Your visibility gap

Profound surfaces in 25/25 Answer Engine Optimization discovery prompts.

Claim Profound →

Executive summary

Profound is already strongly cited for discovery-style AEO prompts (e.g., “best AEO tools that alert you when AI models stop recommending your brand”), and it has first-party comparison content for key evaluation queries like “How does Profound compare to AthenaHQ?” However, the biggest remaining citation risk is conversion-stage extractability: pricing and structured evaluation content need to be maximally crawlable/structured for AI engines to answer “How much does Profound cost?” and “Is Profound worth it for enterprise marketing teams?”

Based on audit of tryprofound.com · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy