AI Visibility
measured71/100
Frequently Cited · in Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals100/100
Strong fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
71
across 123 prompts
AI Share of Voice
71%
across 123 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
Shortlist Position
25/25
Leader · Answer Engine Optimization Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Profound surfaces in 25/25 Answer Engine Optimization discovery prompts.
Profound is already strongly cited for discovery-style AEO prompts (e.g., “best AEO tools that alert you when AI models stop recommending your brand”), and it has first-party comparison content for key evaluation queries like “How does Profound compare to AthenaHQ?” However, the biggest remaining citation risk is conversion-stage extractability: pricing and structured evaluation content need to be maximally crawlable/structured for AI engines to answer “How much does Profound cost?” and “Is Profound worth it for enterprise marketing teams?”
Based on audit of tryprofound.com · Jun 5, 2026