AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in SaaS Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals47/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
64
across 247 prompts
AI Share of Voice
64%
across 247 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
48/80
Leader · Saas Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in SaaS Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Productiv surfaces in 48/80 Saas Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 32 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Productiv is already well-positioned for AI citation in discovery queries like “best SaaS management software for startups” and “top SaaS management tools for small businesses,” supported by its G2 presence (75 reviews, 4.6 rating). The biggest remaining citation risk is evaluation/conversion coverage for the highest-value gaps (e.g., “how to consolidate multiple SaaS tools into a single dashboard” and “what’s useful for tracking changes in SaaS pricing models”): you have first-party competitor framing pages, but you’re missing dedicated, crawlable FAQ-style pages that directly answer those specific IT/procurement workflows.
Based on audit of productiv.com · May 7, 2026