[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/PostHog
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

13

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

54

across 694 prompts

AI Share of Voice

54%

across 694 prompts

Category Visibility

#5

in Product Analytics · of 54

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
452 category
Cited67%302/452
Share of voice62%avg
Engine consensus49%of engines
Competitors4.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories PostHog is visible in

3
  • Product Analytics5 of 54→
  • Feature Flags12 of 22→
  • Observability & APMnot yet measured→

Executive summary

PostHog is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 review volume (1,039 reviews) and clear B2B entity signals (LinkedIn company page, Zapier integration listings). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content—especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and any indexed first-party “[PostHog] vs [Competitor]” pages—because current live checks did not find explicit SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/llms.txt evidence and first-party comparison coverage is unclear.

Based on audit of posthog.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy