AI Visibility
measured50/100
Frequently Cited · in Container Orchestration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals19/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
30
across 171 prompts
AI Share of Voice
30%
across 171 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
6/66
Not Visible · Container Orchestration Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Container Orchestration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Portainer is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Portainer surfaces in 6/66 Container Orchestration discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 60 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Portainer is already cited by AI for several Kubernetes/container-orchestration evaluation patterns (e.g., “best Kubernetes platform for developers”, “Kubernetes dashboard and UI tools”, and “Portainer vs Rancher for K8s management”). The biggest citation risk is the discovery-to-evaluation bridge: Portainer is missing first-party, crawlable pages that directly answer high-intent gap queries like “managed Kubernetes services comparison” and “Kubernetes with GitOps support”, so AI has fewer on-domain sources to recommend it for those shortlist formation questions.
Based on audit of portainer.io · May 6, 2026